How to make your own newspaper - and maybe win a print run

Later in this module we'll demonstrate software that lets you create your own newspaper

And we'll offer prizes of two free, 150-copy print runs of your own  tabloid newspaper

But first...what is the future for print?

Vinyl_finished_grab

It’s not hard to spot the decline in print as a medium for distributing news

And commentators proclaiming the death of print are legion.

So there’s no denying that print’s fortunes have plummeted, just as other media that were overtaken by more convenient technologies have done in the past.

But print still has its cheerleaders. There are even those who say print is the new vinyl – drawing a parallel with the niche appeal of a music-distribution technology that was first overtaken by tape (but who still has a tape deck?) and then by CDs (that don’t seem as robust as my old LPs).

So it’s probably fair to say that print will have a place in the future of news distribution. We just don’t know how big a place it will continue to earn, or for exactly which markets it will still work.

Speaking personally, while I consume about 90 per cent of my news online, and also use the web and mobile versions of print titles I subscribe to, print is still unique.

Online, I pick from a wide array of sources – or brands. With print, I’ll consume a great deal from one particular brand. I’ll always want the weekend papers, and I get a richer experience – and more enjoyment – from reading print than I do from electronic platforms.

So there are situations in which, for me, print is still the favoured way to consume news, information and entertainment.

And when we think of a future for print, it’s worth pondering this explanation for renewed interest in vinyl: “vinyl was the fastest growing music medium in 2010. Why? Essentially, because purchasing and consequently possessing a physical object is an entirely different consumer experience.  This is why, after a long period of disinterest, consumers are increasingly investing in vinyl alongside other mediums, mainly digital.”

I may well be in a small minority in valuing a physical newspaper, but serving minorities that value you highly is not a bad business model.

Clay Shirky on what newspapers must do

Indeed, for newspapers it may be the key to survival. Listen to Clay Shirky.

Shirky posted this analysis of what newspapers need to do to serve effectively those still prepared to buy them.

He says there that while the median reader, the general interest readers who once formed the mass of newspaper readership, won’t pay for news, there is a small and very loyal core readership that will – as long as their newspaper gives them exactly what they want.

And what they want may be highly specialised, and very different from the general mix of news, gossip and entertainment that even ‘serious’ papers have come to rely upon increasingly over the past 20 years or so.

His piece – which I strongly recommend you read in full – ends with this: “It will take time for the economic weight of those [loyal core] users to affect the organizational form of the paper, but slowly slowly, form follows funding. For the moment at least, the most promising experiment in user support means forgoing mass in favor of passion; this may be the year where we see how papers figure out how to reward the people most committed to their long-term survival.”

So what I think we can conclude from this is that news organisations need to pretty much reinvent their print products if they are to survive. While the focus in newspaper offices has, understandably, been on how to use the new range of online, multimedia and social media opportunities that now present themselves, the other big and unaddressed challenge is to create a new form of newspaper that is finely attuned to the needs of the small core of readers who will continue to pay for it.

My hunch is that this will involve the abandonment of the populism that many papers have gone for; the dumbing-down in an effort of satisfying a mass audience.

What Ian Fleming did for the Sunday Times

I was struck, reading Andrew Lycett’s biography of James Bond’s creator Ian Fleming recently, to learn of one of his great circulation-building coups while at his day-job as managing editor of the [London] Sunday Times. It was a 15-week serialisation of a book by Somerset Maugham: an interpretation of the best 10 novels in the world, and their authors. It added 50,000 to the paper’s then circulation of around 500,000 and led to the creation of the Sunday Times’s colour magazine. As Lycett says “in this way Ian influenced a major development in British newspaper journalism.”

Today the Sunday Times’s circulation is just over 1m, which is down by 7.51 per cent on the previous year. Maybe the key to stemming that decline – or at least to establishing the title at a level where its core readers are happy with it – is to look again at heavy-weight content. But pitch something like the Maugham book today as a promotion and marketing would think you were mad.

Elsewhere, there is a growing file of evidence that some audiences – often niche audiences by topic or geography - are best reached via print.

Most papers are local papers, and some locals are doing interesting things with print.

Hyperlocal and niche-audience initiatives

Some are taking the strategy of engaging with citizen journalists online, and then curating some of the content they produce in highly geo-located print products.

 

This post on the MultiAmerican site  - ‘In L.A.’s Boyle Heights, hyperlocal news comes in print’ - talks of a collaboration between  the USC Annenberg journalism school and La Opinión, a Spanish language news organisation, to create a printed paper on which the reporters are local high school and other students.

This is the second hyperlocal news site these partners have launched.

Here’s why this one uses print rather than the web:  “the demographics are different in Boyle Heights, a longtime immigrant port of entry that for the last several decades has been predominantly Latino. While Latinos are active smartphone users, they generally have less Internet access than other groups, hence the old-fashioned distribution approach. A tabloid print edition in Spanish and English, delivered to residents … by La Opinión, compliments an English-language online edition.”

The post concludes: “The community newspaper model, which one might argue is the original hyperlocal news, has been a long-time fixture in Eastside neighborhoods. Many of these are covered by the small Hispanic-owned local papers published by Eastern Group Publications “ which have a circulation of over 104,000 and a readership of nearly 500,000.

In the UK, print newspapers for ethnic, immigrant and language groups have sprung up. If you are a registered user of MMJ you’ll find an overview of that phenomenon here and an interview with the editor of a UK-Lithuanian newspaper, Londono Zinios, here.

Some newspapers are taking the strategy of engaging with citizen journalists online, and then curating some of that content in highly geo-located print products.

The cheerily titled Newspaper Death Watch, which chronicles the decline of print titles, found this piece of encouraging news; “Does print still have value? The people at neighborsgo.com would argue that it does.

 

 

“This website, which is a spin-off of the Dallas Morning News, is using a social network to anchor a community journalism initiative. Local residents create profiles and post information about their interests.”

Those posts are scanned by editors and the best are curated in 11 print editions covering 71 communities which are home-delivered to over 340,000 Dallas Morning News subscribers each Friday.

“The opportunity to be featured in print is a major impetus for local residents to contribute, says managing editor Oscar Marti­nez. And it may actually be a jump start for careers. One journalism student used her trip to Beijing to contribute a series of articles on the preparations for the [2008] Olympics. The visibility she’s received has been worth more than any internship could offer.”

It's not just newspapers that are reinventing their print personas. B2B magazines are working to the same goal. Just as I was writing this, an alert popped up that "The Lawyer magazine has unveiled a radical redesign that will see its weekly print edition devoted entirely to analysis, features and comment."

Editor Catrin Griffiths says: “Print works, as long as you get the product right – analytical doesn’t have to mean anodyne.

"The big issues of the day are best served analytically and at length - it’s what print does best."

So, the challenge for print in general, and for the newspaper industry in particular, is to learn who will pay for a print product, and what they will need to see in it.

Meanwhile, maybe you'd like to create your own newspaper?

Next: How to create your own newspaper

 

How to use the new Facebook features for journalism: timeline profile, subscribe, share and more

andybull Twylah Fan Page

Building proficiency with Facebook: MMJ Masterclass 38 (mp3)

Ever been driving down a new road and suddenly found you’ve caught up with the construction team?

That’s the sensation I’ve been getting using Facebook in the past couple of weeks

The Facebook construction team is laying down the social media equivalent of hot tarmac as fast as they can, but public launch has been delayed, and the cars are backing up impatiently, wanting to use this new stretch of road.

A lot's changed on Facebook.

You may have heard about Facebook Timeline, which replaces the old style profile.

If you haven’t don’t  worry.

We’ll cover it.

And we’ll look at the new ways a journalist can use this new-style timeline profile in conjunction with a fan page – like the ones we built in Masterclass 34

The developments mean you now not only have a place for your journalism - your fan page -  but also a more personal space for you as a journalist - your new-style timeline profile.

Because, while you can still invite fans to like your page, you can also now invite people to subscribe to your updates on your new-style timeline profile.

And you can now divide your Facebook community into distinct groups – not unlike the Circles concept on Google+ –  and post different content to different groups.

If it sounds complicated, that’s because it is!

But it also gives us a lot more potential for using Facebook for journalism.

So we’ll run through all the new stuff, and demonstrate how it can be used.

Fortunately, none of those changes invalidate anything we covered in Masterclass 34's Getting started with Facebook section.

But, just to check you are up to speed, and ready for this masterclass on Building Proficiency with Facebook, here’s what we covered in Getting Started:

  • Opening a Facebook account
  • Setting up a profile page for you as a journalist and a separate Facebook page for your journalism. (One quick point: profiles are now called timelines)
  • Posting content to Facebook – and what works best
  • Gaining friends on Facebook, and finding people to invite to view your page
  • Promoting your Facebook page with a content-rich widget on your website
  • Posting content on Facebook – what works best
  • Finding and researching stories on Facebook

If you need to fill in any gaps, and you are registered with MMJ, you can catch up on Getting Started here.

Here’s what we'll cover in the following modules:
 


Next: Creating a timeline as your public profile

 

Visual storytelling for journalists: seven essential free tools for you to use

It’s now very easy for us to bring really engaging visual storytelling techniques to our reporting

A number of great apps and tools let us use the full range of media

MMJ Masterclass 36: Seven essential visual storytelling tools (mp3)

They let us geotag what we are creating – which means we can put it on a map

And some of them let us broadcast these great visual stories direct from our smartphones.

We’re going to look at a range of the latest apps here.

They don’t all do everything I’ve mentioned.

Some are great for live reporting, others are best at other things

At building mapped, multimedia travel features, for example

Or creating timelines

So here’s a quick introduction to the apps and tools we’ll be working with

We’ll look at:

  • Meporter – for live, multimedia, geotgagged reports filed direct from the scene of a story
  • At Intersect – for multimedia, mapped stories rooted in place and time, and which can intersect with other stories in the same place. (It’s actually a lot more straightforward than it may sound)
  • At iMapFlickr –which turns Flickr pictures into a journey told on a map
  • At Gowalla – a check-in site which has just reinvented itself with a focus on travel and storytelling
  • At Foursquare – another check-in site which is also developing its capacity as a storytelling paltform
  • At Dipity, which is great for creating embeddable timelines fast
  • And at Vuvox, which lets you create really professional timeline visualisaitons without having to learn Flash or Photoshop.

Those last two items have been picked up from a session we did in the MMJ summer school a couple of months ago. They’re added here to give an added dimension to our discussion and demonstrations of visual storytelling.

Some of the other tools we’ve looked at before, either in masterclasses or in the MMJ textbook. We’re returning to them now because there’s new stuff to be said – and new functionality to explore.

The whole subject of visual storytelling is a big, and fast moving one. There’s a good deal of other information on it elsewhere in the MMJ website and in the paper or ebook textbook. So we’ll finish up with a screen of links to other relevant tuition.

Next: Meporter; live, multimedia, geotagged reporting from your smartphone

The essential guide to doing great journalism on Facebook

First, why use Facebook for your journalism?

When I’m teaching social media I find the first hurdle is that many journalists are suspicious of it as a publishing platform.

They get Twitter, but with Facebook they’re not so sure. It's just too social for them, too much about friends sharing stuff that's very personal to a small circle.

But I think it’s a great platform. Here’s why.

Facebook is beginning to move down the Web 3.0 route that underpins our interest, as journalists, in social media, and which is covered in depth in Masterclass 2 of MMJ.

I talked there about how readers were creating personalised news stands of the material they were interested in.

That's exactly what users are able to do with Facebook.

On Facebook, users can become fans of us, of our content, and welcome our Facebook publishing stream onto their own news feed page.

There, our content is delivered alongside material from their own social circle.

The result is a hybrid of personal communications from friends and material from organisations that an individual likes, enjoys, values, and wants to follow.

So Facebook is a very special place, and a very significant one for journalists to work in.

But we need to learn how to use it most effectively. 

I posted an introduction to Facebook here If you are a subscriber to MMJ you can check it out, to become a susbcriber, buy the textbook, in ebook or paper form, here

I won't go over that ground again, but try to give an overview of the latest advice and thinking about optimising Facebook for journalism.
One key thing.
Keep your personal Facebook presence separate from your journalistic presence. I have separate accounts, so there is a complete separation. Others simply create a page for their journalism on their existing account. 

 

Next: Top tips. Guidance for journalists from Facebook

Four journalistic things to do this summer - for when doing nothing is just too much effort

These are the latest additions to MMJ free Journalism Summer School.

Hopefully they'll give you stuff to do on the rare occasions you want to engage your brain in the coming weeks.

How's your social media clout? Comparing Klout, TweetGrader, Post Rank, Peer Index and Twitalyzer: http://www.multimedia-journalism.co.uk/node/1880

How to use Sina Weibo to leap the Great Firewall of China: http://www.multimedia-journalism.co.uk/node/1886

Want a job? You need to sell yourself online with a really impressive CV, resume or portfolio: http://www.multimedia-journalism.co.uk/node/1891

How to create multimedia timelines and visualisations - with no coding or graphics skills: http://www.multimedia-journalism.co.uk/node/1900

How’s your social media clout? Comparing Klout, TweetGrader, Post Rank, Peer Index and Twitalyzer

Want to know how well your social media strategy is working?

We need to know that we are engaging successfully with colleagues, influencers and our wider audience on Twitter, Facebook, Linked In and elsewhere

Otherwise, we can’t know whether we are getting all we could out of those social platforms.

A number of applications are clamouring to give us the low down.

The loudest is probably Klout, but it’s by no means the only one gaining traction.

There are also TweetGrader, PostRank Analytics, Peer Index and Twitalyzer, among others.

I’ve been trialling that shortlist for a couple of weeks, to see what each could tell me about my social engagement.

They’ll all give you a grade, so you get some idea of how well you are doing, both in absolute terms – marks out of a 100 usually – and compared to others.

But, when looking at how these apps perform, it’s hard to compare like with like.

For example, in the grab below you'll see the latest handful of tweets that happened to land from those I follow just as I was writing this sentence.

Klout and Peer Index seldom agree

The number alongside the orange K  is their Klout score, the yellow-backgrounded number is their Peer Index score:

None are the same. Some are reasonably close, but others vary wildly.

So how can I - and they - know which of these two scores is the more accurate measure of their social engangement?

One, the other, neither?

Using myself as an example, I found that my scores on the five platforms I've been testing are all very different.

They differ  because the five all appear to use different algorithms, and to put weight on different aspects of your social presence.

Hence, you’re likely to score differently on each of them

Which is why, I guess, I can get a high of 95 on TweetGrader, a low of 1 on Twitalyzer and marks in between – 46 on Klout, 52 on PeerIndex and a  highly variable ranking, today of 0 on PostRank. It's often 1, and at other times varies wildly, but has never been higher than 35.

All of which is puzzling, and confusing.

Which of the five scores I get is the most objective, and hence the most valuable?

Which actually measures the aspects of my social performance that are important to me?

I’m not going to pretend I have been able to gain a completely clear answer to that question, but here’s a run-through of what each of those brands says about me, and a bit about how they work.

What’ll be the best one for you?

Who knows.

The best bet is probably to try a couple that looks like they do what you need, trial them, and take it from there.

This content continues on Multimedia Journalism: A Practical Guide, as part of the FREE Summer School feature

You can click below to get started with the first app I look at.

Next: Klout

Free multimedia journalism summer school from MMJ

Things are a little more relaxed at the free MMJ summer school.

From July to September we'll be covering a range of new areas for the social, mobile, multimedia journalist.

These won't be big projects, they won't involve a lot of effort to master, but they will be areas where there are new developments worth getting up to speed with.

They're designed to be absorbed easily - I picture you on a beach, up a mountain, or in a bar, just taking a quick half hour on your laptop, mobile or tablet.

And looking for something to prevent your brain turning to mush.

This stuff is free, it won't be paywalled until you've fogotten about it.

All I ask of you in return is this:

If you are an educator, check out the new eductors' area and see if you can't give me some ideas for what you'd like me to do to help you deliver journalism courses.

If you're a journalism student, please get involved in the MMJ project and tell me what more I could be doing to help you.

And if you're a working hack - perhaps drawn here because you'd like to pick up some new skills - then let me know what's useful, less than useful and what more you'd like to see added to the MMJ poject. And maybe take a look at this.

Here's a rough list of what I aim to tackle

When (if) an item goes live then a link will work for it below.

But don't count on it all coming good. After all, my brain's turning to mush too.

  • How’s your social media clout? Comparing Klout, Tweetgrader, Post Rank Analysis, Peer Index and Twitalyzer. Find out more...
  • Behind the Great firewall of China: Weibo for round-eyes
  • Sell yourself: the best online CV/resume tools
  • Google's mobile-site maker compared and contrasted
  • Xtranormal for animation
  • Social media management tools - what's best for you

There'll be other stuff, but if you want to suggest something, feel free to either DM me @andybull or use the comment button to get in touch

 

 

Help me build an educators' resource bank at Multimedia Journalism: A Practical Guide

So, what do you need?

 

What could MMJ be doing to help you deliver journalism learning to your students?

I want to build MMJ’s usefulness to educators by listening to any ideas you have for things we don’t do now that would help you.

I’d like to build a resource bank that will support you in your work, and enable you easily to build lectures, seminars and workshops around the content of MMJ.

To do that, I need to listen. I’ve started, and heard some interesting ideas.

One suggestion is that white-labelled PowerPoint presentations covering key aspects of a journalism syllabus, organised for individual lectures in batches of 10 or 12, and which you can brand and adapt as you like, would work well.

Another is that resources which enable you to take a current news story and use it to demonstrate particular principles of coverage, or as the basis of a workshop, would help.

So you’d get a package of content – examples, demonstrations and multimedia resources - built around a particular current major news story or issue.

Maybe a combination of the two makes sense.

So you get full lecture slides and notes for a particular module – anything from live blogging or using an iPhone for reporting to creating news backgrounders on a big court case –  with tuition built around current topics.

The lecture/seminar/workshop packs would be updated regularly to take in a new current story.

How about material designed to follow the syllabus of the NCTJ’s Diploma in Journalism, or the NCE?

What do you think?

If these or any other ideas strike you as offering useful resources, then please let me know.

And if you’ve ideas for areas of your syllabus you’d particularly like to be covered, tell me, giving as much detail as you can of what you’d appreciate having delivered for you.

Another question is how this educator’s resource bank should operate.

How would you feel about having a Linked In group, a Huddle workspace or other forum for discussion and sharing?

Or do you prefer to just dip in to resources, grab what you need and go?

Over the summer I’ll be consulting as widely as I can, and your input is enormously valuable.

When I’ve got an idea of the things that work for people, I’ll report back, and then start building this area.

Please DM me on Twitter @andybull, use the Comment buttons on the MMJ site, or email me at andy at andybull dot co dot uk with anything that you'd find helpful